Posts Tagged ‘idc’
Servers: global sales fell by a quarter in the first quarter, agains the same period in 2008
Global sales were $9.9 bn (£6.14 bn), IDC said, the lowest figure since the firm started monitoring the computer server market 12 years ago.
Dell was the vendor hardest hit, with server revenue falling 31.2%.
IDC said they expected the situation to continue, although they predicted some recovery by 2010.
Europe: Telcos hit by the recession were already struggling with saturated and competitive markets
“In Europe, every five-year-old has a phone,” said a telecoms manager, who declined to be named.
“Margins have steadily been declining all over Europe… in the UK and Spain they are eroding to nothing rapidly, Germany is still flat and there is some growth in the Czech Republic, Macedonia,” the manager added.
Vodafone, the world’s largest mobile phone company by revenue, for example has seen margins in the UK shrink to around 22 percent from around 33 percent three years ago. Deutsche Telekom’s T-Mobile UK had to digest a margin decline of more than 40 percent to 15 percent in that time.
So far, operators have adapted by expanding into emerging markets, which are seen driving global mobile revenue growth to $855 billion by 2012 from $700 billion in 2008 according to advisory firm IDC.
They have also begun to offer data services to encourage customers to spend more by enabling them to search the Internet, listen to music and share photos with friends.
“That means European mobile revenue growth increasingly depends on how much the operators can stimulate additional use of existing services and promote uptake of new services,” IDC said in a study of the European mobile market.
“So far, their success in both respects has been steady but not spectacular.”
Under normal circumstances those measures would be sufficient to keep margins steady, but with the impact of the global recession and increased regulation designed to lower cell phone tariffs, mobile operators will have to do more.
“Even without the credit crunch, all signs indicated that the industry was reaching saturation,” Daiwa analyst Michael Kovacocy told Reuters.
“We’ve now had an erosion of voice (revenues) driven by maturity of that industry, competition and adverse regulation, and this is not going to alleviate itself once the macro economy comes back,” Kovacocy said.
THREE RESPONSES
“We can do three things in our industry, cut costs, consolidate and share networks,” the telecoms manager said, explaining that cost cutting could entail outsourcing of anything from call centres to IT development.
“But when you outsource IT development you are really cutting into the meat of the business and you relinquish control over innovation,” the telecoms manager said.
Network sharing has already begun to catch on: In March Vodafone and Telefonica agreed to share network infrastructure in four European countries to meet demand for mobile broadband, while saving hundreds of millions of pounds.
Vodafone, which also has deals in other countries, said it could save up to 10 percent in costs through passive sharing deals such as the one agreed with Telefonica.
Consolidation is a trickier issue.
Analysts and executives agree that consolidation in Europe is needed but said it was hard to tell when it would start.
France Telecom’s finance chief Gervais Pellisser told the Reuters Global Technology Summit the environment was difficult because financial markets lacked the stability to provide funding, and he noticed signs of increased protectionism.
On recurring rumours that France Telecom’s Orange brand could buy T-Mobile UK, Pellissier quashed speculation saying there was no interest because with a competitive market such as the UK, you could not guarantee holding on to the customers.
Companies could opt for a consolidation in kind by combining two businesses instead of a takeover as it would not require cash or a premium and save costs by shutting down one network, closing excess shops and cutting jobs.
“Business needs to get really ugly though before companies agree to that” the telecoms manager said.
But despite the three-pronged response, pressures will continue as smaller rivals have a field day, offering simple voice plans which do not include subsidised handsets.
Stan Miller, the head of Dutch operator KPN’s international mobile business, told Reuters that operators would have to lose their fixation with average revenue per user (ARPU).
“ARPU schmarpu… You can have 100 euros ($138) ARPU, but what happened to the margin you actually make, what happened to your cash flow?” he asked at the summit.
KPN has enjoyed huge success in Europe since it launched the first of its many no-frills offerings four years ago.
France’s number two broadband player Iliad has said it also sees the chance to offer cheap mobile deals and will bid for the fourth licence, which is expected to come up this year.
On top of competition pressures, operators will also have to confront new challenges after the European Commission adopted guidelines to slash the cost of routing mobile calls, known as MTR rates — an important revenue stream for large carriers which has also acted to prevent new entrants to the market. ($1=.7254 Euro)
AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service provides enterprise customers with on-demand control over storage, distribution and retrieval of data
AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service provides a business-class storage service that lets customers use the AT&T network cloud to store, distribute and retrieve data as needed to meet their business or legal requirements. Customers will be able to specify their storage criteria — called user policies — through a Web-based customer portal. The service automatically scales storage capacity up or down as needed, and users pay only for the amount they use.
AT&T has selected EMC Corporation, a world leader in information infrastructure solutions, as the technology provider for the underlying AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service platform. The companies have signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to jointly develop and market the service.
AT&T is introducing the service to customers on a controlled basis this month, with plans to make the service generally available in the third quarter. The service is deployed in AT&T Internet data centers (IDCs) in the U.S. and will be accessible by customers connecting to the Web anywhere. In time, AT&T plans to add the service to select global IDCs to meet customer demand internationally.
“The demand for data storage continues to grow at a staggering rate, driven by companies’ need for 24×7 access to business critical data,” said Roman Pacewicz, senior vice president of strategy and application services, AT&T Business Solutions. “AT&T Synaptic Storage helps enterprises get a handle on these increasingly complex storage environments, while controlling costs and improving service levels.”
Across the industry, businesses are struggling to find cost-effective approaches to manage large amounts of data generated by today’s high bandwidth applications such as Web content, streaming media, distributed file sharing and medical imaging. In many cases, businesses invest in costly equipment for more data storage capacity, or they may adopt cumbersome and redundant data retrieval procedures.
AT&T’s on-demand, network-based approach provides much needed assistance by eliminating the need for up-front capital investments for storage capacity while offering flexibility to meet changing business needs. AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service is especially helpful for businesses with fluctuating data storage requirements. The service also is a great fit for extended retention of data no longer needed for transactions, which often can be provided at a fraction of the cost of managing data over a dedicated storage area network. The data can be retrieved at any time, to any customer location, including a third-party data center, using a variety of devices such as laptops, smart phones or other Web-enabled handheld devices.
Using EMC(R) Atmos(TM) technology, a policy-based information management platform, the AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service gives users the flexibility to store, distribute and retrieve data through the Internet or directly from the AT&T network cloud via a virtual private network or other transport service, enabling customers to create a “virtual private storage cloud” protected by AT&T’s industry’s leading network-based security services.
“EMC is vigilant about delivering customers more choice, better control and increased efficiency in large-scale cloud storage environments,” said Mike Feinberg, senior vice president, EMC Cloud Infrastructure Group. “The global scalability, policy-based service level management, and broad feature set of EMC Atmos combined with the AT&T network cloud delivers an industry-leading cloud based storage service for customers. We’re pleased to be working with AT&T to deliver customers a solution that delivers the choice, control flexibility — and cost efficiencies — of cloud.”
“Cloud storage holds out the promise of enabling a new generation of storage services with flexible, on-demand capabilities that address both runaway costs and a diverse combination of changing business priorities and regulatory requirements,” said Adam Couture, principal research analyst with Gartner. “The initial attraction has been staggering cost differential between traditional storage offerings and cloud storage. But as cloud storage matures providers will differentiate themselves in areas like security, data portability, ease of access and integration and quality of service.”
AT&T to Deliver Cloud-Based ‘Storage as a Service’ Offer to Enterprise Customers
see also please go to AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service
just say no to GAPI – What you need to know about AllKeys and input management.
The Games API (GAPI) was a technology that allowed Windows Mobile 2003 applications to quickly draw graphics onto the device screen. It also contained functions that allowed an application to request all button press messages, even the ones that were normally intercepted by the Windows Mobile operating system.
The graphics component of GAPI was replaced by DirectDraw (which allowed hardware acceleration) in Windows Mobile 5.0. Application compatibility was maintained so that older programs would still work.
Most of the reference material for GAPI was removed from the Windows Mobile 6.1 documentation set, although the input functions were kept, so that applications could still request all key and button presses. Application compatibility was maintained for this release as well.
This is all changing for the next generation of Windows Mobile, Windows Mobile 6.5. Although some devices may still support GAPI, there is no longer a requirement for device manufacturers or mobile operators to ship or test for compatibility with GAPI. This means that applications that require GAPI will provide an unpredictable experience for users on Windows Mobile 6.5 devices.
Another important change is that acceptance to the Windows Marketplace for Mobile and Designed for Windows Mobile certification requires no application dependencies on GAPI.
In order to replace the input functionality that GAPI once provided, a new keyboard API function is being made public. This function is AllKeys(), and is defined below. One great thing about this substitution is that AllKeys has been a part of Windows Mobile as long as GAPI, and is actually the API call that GAPI wrapped in order to publicly expose this functionality. This means that the transition to AllKeys should be easy, and backwards compatibility should be maintained.
You can migrate your input code to AllKeys in the following way:
Replace:
· GXOpenInput() with AllKeys(TRUE).
· GXCloseInput() with AllKeys(FALSE).
While AllKeys is set to true, all key presses will be sent to your application for handling.
Since GXOpenInput and GXCloseInput were simply wrappers for a call to AllKeys, so this substitution should cause no change in behavior in your programs.
The following is the definition of the new AllKeys API.
AllKeys
This function allows your programs to request that all key presses be sent directly to the requesting application. Normally some buttons are intercepted by the operating system for its own use, but games and input – intensive applications may want access to these buttons for their own use.
Syntax
BOOL AllKeys(
BOOL bAllKeys
);
Parameters
|
Parameter |
Description |
|
bAllKeys |
[in] If bAllKeys is set to TRUE, this function allows all keyboard events to be sent to the application. (This includes the soft-key buttons and back button). If it is set to FALSE, this function specifies standard keyboard event behavior. Some events including soft-key buttons and the back button are not sent to the application. |
Return Value
Nonzero indicates success. Zero indicates failure. To get extended error information, call GetLastError.
Sample Code
The following C++ code illustrates how to use AllKeys. In the application that this sample is taken from, a check box is used to set AllKeys to true or false.
// process checkbox
case IDC_ALL_KEYS_CHECK_BOX:
if (g_AllKeys == true)
{
// Allow the OS to intercept some button presses
AllKeys(FALSE);
g_AllKeys = false;
// set button state
SendMessage(hwndCtl,BM_SETCHECK, BST_UNCHECKED,0);
}
else
{
// Do not allow os to intercept button presses
AllKeys(TRUE);
g_AllKeys = true;
//set button state
SendMessage(hwndCtl,BM_SETCHECK, BST_CHECKED,0);
}
Requirements
OS Versions: Windows Mobile 2003 and later.
Header: Winuser.h.
Time to revisit plug-in tax credit legislation?
Is its battery big enough?
There has been an AP story all over the Internet covering the difficulties of reaching President Obama’s 1 million plug-ins by 2015 goal. Cheap gas, a struggling economy, bankrupt automakers, and excessively expensive technology, etc. make the goal impossible without massive help from the government.
Thus far the government has offered tens of billions in loans and aid to help automakers retool, in addition to plug-in tax credits for consumers worth up to $7500. While these tax credits are not as heavily skewed towards large battery plug-ins as originally proposed, they are still skewed towards vehicles that some studies have questioned in terms of efficiency.
Now, I don’t want to argue against large battery plug-ins, but I do wonder if this legislation is as effective and efficient as it could be. Even worse, I wonder if this legislation is semi-counterproductive.
For instance, with plug-in profitability possibly a decade away, are plug-ins more about CAFE balancing than an aggressive attack on oil dependence? Also, will these vehicles be profitable after tax credits expire?
Is the size of the battery really the key this early in the game, or should there be more focus on putting lithium into as many cars as possible as quickly as possible?