Archive for April, 2009
But hybrids aren’t profitable……
How much money does Honda lose on each hybrid?
$0.00.
That’s how much Honda loses on each hybrid it sells. In fact, the other day I read that both Honda and Toyota make about a $3,000 profit on each hybrid sold.
Of course, that doesn’t include all R&D costs, especially on Honda’s hybrids since Honda hasn’t sold nearly as many hybrid cars as Toyota. Now that Toyota has sold well over a million hybrids, however, development costs have probably been recovered.
Yet, not one US automaker has a solid Insight or Prius contender. When will they? Ever?
Within the next five years I’d bet gas prices will be about $3.00 – $4.00 per gallon, a price that could make hybrid cars like the Insight and Prius two of the top selling vehicles in America.
What will the Big 3 have?
Time to pull the plug on the Chevy Volt?
It just can’t help GM?
If you hate GM, then you probably don’t think much of the Chevy Volt. In fact, you might even call it an unrealistic hype machine into which GM has sunk far too much money.
That’s the argument the Washington Post makes today, and I have to admit, it’s a pretty persuasive argument. For instance, the article points to numerous analyses, including some done by President Obama’s auto task force, that indicate the economics simply don’t make sense for a vehicle like the Volt. Thus, how can the Volt help GM’s bottom line?
For example, even with $4.00 gas, it would still take, minimally, six years for the the Volt to recover its costs compared to today’s Toyota Prius. And, that’s assuming the Volt will only cost $30,000 after huge government tax credits and subsidies. Even at such a cost, it would still take far longer for many other Volt owners to recover their costs compared to a Prius.
Thus, this Post editorial suggests pulling the plug on the Volt, and I couldn’t disagree more.
I have long argued that the Volt should never have been an excuse not to develop a Prius-contender. Perhaps GM’s lithium-powered BAS hybrid system can fill this void, but cheap quality hybrids will be a necessity for any automaker in the very near future.
Fortunately, GM’s billion dollar investment into the Volt could help produce such cheap hybrid vehicles, aside from the Volt. Because much of GM’s Volt investment has been centered around one core technology, lithium-ion batteries, GM could conceivably parlay this knowledge into many different types of hybrid and electric vehicles.
Hence, to call GM’s Volt venture a waste that helped lead to bankruptcy and a loss of corporate reputation is pure nonsense.
I’ve seen GM’s battery labs. I’ve seen GM’s virtual design center. These two elements alone could make GM’s Volt investment worth the cost, even if the Volt itself is another decade away from any sort of real world, cost-effective impact.
Nonetheless, the Volt cannot save GM in the next decade. However, that does not mean the plug should be pulled on the Volt. Instead, it means GM needs to utilize the massive amount of intelligence gleaned from the Volt and convert it into a more well-rounded and balanced hybrid and electric vehicle portfolio, including the Volt.
If GM can do that, the Volt might just be GM’s smartest investment ever. If not, maybe we shouldn’t just pull the plug on the Volt, but GM.
Why do you want bankruptcy for GM and Chrysler?
Will it make GM stronger, smarter?
The other day I read that 2 out of 3 Americans want GM and Chrysler to go into bankruptcy? Why?
To punish the UAW? Bondholders? Corporate boards and executives? All of the above?
Ultimately, do Americans believe that bankruptcy will make these automakers stronger? Or, do they hope they will simply just disappear?
Even if these companies successfully emerge from bankruptcy, does it change your opinion about their new vehicles, particularly autos like the Chevy Volt?
UK: report on the employment effects of UK economic stimulus of IT
China: China Mobile has acquired 12% of Far EasTone (Taiwan) and entered into a strategic partnership
On completion of the deal, the two companies will begin a strategic alliance from which China Mobile hopes to use Far EasTone’s experience in rolling out 3G technology, applications, and value-added data services.
Taiwan is one of the world’s most mature 3G markets, and 3 million of Far EasTone’s 6.2 million subscribers are on the company’s 3G network. It was the first in Taiwan to launch 3.6-Mbit/s HSPA in October 2006, and it holds a WiMax license.
The companies also agreed to work together on procurement, roaming, data and value-added services, and network and technology advancement, including research and development on communication standards for future technical developments.

